Bluefield water works supreme court
WebChallenges In The Water Industry: ... principle are Bluefield Water Works vs. the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (“Bluefield”) (1923), and the Federal Power Commission vs. Hope Natural Gas Company (1944). ... As the U.S. Supreme Court stated in the Bluefield case, a utility is entitled to earn a return comparable to WebDec 10, 2007 · 11 The Supreme Court decisions in Bluefield Water 12 Works and Hope Natural Gas have been affirmed in In re 13 Permian Basin Area Rate Case, 390 U.S. 747, 88 S.Ct 1344, 14 20 L.Ed 2d 312 (1968), and Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch, 15 488 U. S. 299, 109 S. Ct. 609, 102 L. Ed. 2d. 646 (1989). 16 The Idaho Supreme Court has also …
Bluefield water works supreme court
Did you know?
WebIt found that there should be included $25,000 for the Bluefield Valley waterworks plant in Virginia, 10 percent for going value, and $10,000 for working capital. If these be added to … http://www.catalystcllc.com/articles/load-retention-rates-a-framework-for-regulatory-evaluation/
WebTwo United States Supreme Court (Court) cases are the basis for rate 16 of return regulation in the United States. They are the Bluefield Water Works 17 (Bluefield)2 and the Hope Natural Gas (Hope) 3. cases. In. Hope, the Court . 18. established the following standards for the return on equity that must be Web4. The legal standard for setting the fair rate of return has been established by the United States Supreme Court in the Bluefield and Hope cases. 5. There is no dispute over the reasonableness of Sierra's proposed capital structure. 6. There is no dispute over the reasonableness of Sierra's proposed costs of long-term debt and preferred stock. 7.
http://www.catalystcllc.com/articles/utility-rates-fair-just-and-reasonable/ WebThe decree of the state court is Affirmed. BLUEFIELD WATER WORKS & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 256. Argued January 22, 1923.--Decided June 11, 1923. 1.
WebApr 27, 2024 · Bluefield Water Works, 1923. The Supreme Court later explained that the rate of return “involves balancing of the investor and consumer interests while insuring that the … return to the equity owner should be commensurate with the returns on investments in other enterprises having corresponding risks …” Hope Natural Gas, 1944.
Web200 Rogers Street Bluefield, WV 24701 Phone: 304-327-2401. Photo courtesy of Michael D. Linkous. All rights reserved. christopher warner army psychiatristWebThis principle was established in another landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Bluefield Water Works and Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia (“Bluefield”), 262 U.S. 679 (1923). Hope and Bluefield are cited almost universally by regulated utilities in the U.S. as a basis for setting rates that are fair, just and reasonable. gfa heatingWebguided by the criteria set forth in Bluefield Water Works and Improvement Co. v. Public Service Comm’n of West Virginia, 262 U.S. 679 (1923) and Federal Power Comm’n v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591 (1944). In Bluefield the United States Supreme Court stated: A public utility is entitled to such rates as will permit it to earn a gfahfhm_650 outlook.comWebJan 23, 2024 · 23 understanding that two United States Supreme Court decisions provide the controlling ELECTRONICALLY FILED-2024 ... The first decision is Bluefield Water Works and 2 Improvement Co. v. Public Serv. Comm’n of West Virginia, 262 U.S. 679 (1923). In this 3 decision, the Court stated: 4 The annual rate that will constitute just … gfa holdingWebCourt Documents Opinion of the Court United States Supreme Court 262 U.S. 679 Bluefield Waterworks Improvement Company v. Public Service Commission of West … gfa heathertonWebUnited States Supreme Court BLUEFIELD WATER WORKS CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (1923) No. 256 Argued: January 22, 1923 Decided: June 11, 1923 [262 … christopher wargo md vermontWebIn the Bluefleld Water Works case, decided in 1923, the Supreme Court not only restated its earlier pronouncements concerning fair rate of return but also made several new observations. christopher warnimont