site stats

Bluefield water works supreme court

WebIn Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 262 U.S. 679 (1923), the Supreme Court spelled out the requirement for the exercise of regulatory judgment of multiple factors in fixing the rate of return, stating that the rate "must be determined by the exercise of a fair and enlightened judgment, having regard to all rele- … WebBluefield Water Works and Improvement Co. v. Public Service Comm’n of West Virginia, 262 U.S. 679 (1923) (Bluefield) and . ... The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held: [T]he appellants did not have the burden of proving that the plant additions were improper, unnecessary or too costly; on the contrary, that burden is, by statute, on the ...

Regulatory Finance Concepts Educational Seminar - South …

Web30 several famous U.S. Supreme Court cases, especially Bluefield Water Works1 and 1 Bluefield Water Works & Imp. Co. v. Public Service Comm’n of West Virginia, 262 U.S. 679 (1923). CILCO Rebuttal Exhibit 7.17 Page 3 of 18 31 Hope Natural Gas.2 Reference to these two cases has become rather an automatic WebThe decree of the state court is Affirmed. BLUEFIELD WATER WORKS & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA … gfa gridion football assocation roblox https://eastwin.org

Home Page Bluefield West Virginia

WebBLUEFIELD WATERWORKS & IMPROVEMENT CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA et al. Supreme Court 262 U.S. 679 43 S.Ct. 675 67 L.Ed. 1176 … WebThe Supreme Court found that the FPC had jurisdiction to consider non-jurisdictional income in setting United's rate. The Court stated: ... From Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission, 262 U.S. 679, 692, 43 S. Ct. 675, 679, 67 L. Ed. 1176, 1182 (1923), we quoted: WebSummary. In Bluefield Water Works Co. v. Public Service Commission, supra, while ten per cent. had been added for going value, the total result was a valuation which could not … gfa gotha

U.S. Supreme Court Transcripts of Record Bluefield Water …

Category:Challenges In The Water Industry: The Rate Approval Process

Tags:Bluefield water works supreme court

Bluefield water works supreme court

Judicial Review of Rate of Return Calculations - Mitchell …

WebChallenges In The Water Industry: ... principle are Bluefield Water Works vs. the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (“Bluefield”) (1923), and the Federal Power Commission vs. Hope Natural Gas Company (1944). ... As the U.S. Supreme Court stated in the Bluefield case, a utility is entitled to earn a return comparable to WebDec 10, 2007 · 11 The Supreme Court decisions in Bluefield Water 12 Works and Hope Natural Gas have been affirmed in In re 13 Permian Basin Area Rate Case, 390 U.S. 747, 88 S.Ct 1344, 14 20 L.Ed 2d 312 (1968), and Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch, 15 488 U. S. 299, 109 S. Ct. 609, 102 L. Ed. 2d. 646 (1989). 16 The Idaho Supreme Court has also …

Bluefield water works supreme court

Did you know?

WebIt found that there should be included $25,000 for the Bluefield Valley waterworks plant in Virginia, 10 percent for going value, and $10,000 for working capital. If these be added to … http://www.catalystcllc.com/articles/load-retention-rates-a-framework-for-regulatory-evaluation/

WebTwo United States Supreme Court (Court) cases are the basis for rate 16 of return regulation in the United States. They are the Bluefield Water Works 17 (Bluefield)2 and the Hope Natural Gas (Hope) 3. cases. In. Hope, the Court . 18. established the following standards for the return on equity that must be Web4. The legal standard for setting the fair rate of return has been established by the United States Supreme Court in the Bluefield and Hope cases. 5. There is no dispute over the reasonableness of Sierra's proposed capital structure. 6. There is no dispute over the reasonableness of Sierra's proposed costs of long-term debt and preferred stock. 7.

http://www.catalystcllc.com/articles/utility-rates-fair-just-and-reasonable/ WebThe decree of the state court is Affirmed. BLUEFIELD WATER WORKS & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 256. Argued January 22, 1923.--Decided June 11, 1923. 1.

WebApr 27, 2024 · Bluefield Water Works, 1923. The Supreme Court later explained that the rate of return “involves balancing of the investor and consumer interests while insuring that the … return to the equity owner should be commensurate with the returns on investments in other enterprises having corresponding risks …” Hope Natural Gas, 1944.

Web200 Rogers Street Bluefield, WV 24701 Phone: 304-327-2401. Photo courtesy of Michael D. Linkous. All rights reserved. christopher warner army psychiatristWebThis principle was established in another landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Bluefield Water Works and Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia (“Bluefield”), 262 U.S. 679 (1923). Hope and Bluefield are cited almost universally by regulated utilities in the U.S. as a basis for setting rates that are fair, just and reasonable. gfa heatingWebguided by the criteria set forth in Bluefield Water Works and Improvement Co. v. Public Service Comm’n of West Virginia, 262 U.S. 679 (1923) and Federal Power Comm’n v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591 (1944). In Bluefield the United States Supreme Court stated: A public utility is entitled to such rates as will permit it to earn a gfahfhm_650 outlook.comWebJan 23, 2024 · 23 understanding that two United States Supreme Court decisions provide the controlling ELECTRONICALLY FILED-2024 ... The first decision is Bluefield Water Works and 2 Improvement Co. v. Public Serv. Comm’n of West Virginia, 262 U.S. 679 (1923). In this 3 decision, the Court stated: 4 The annual rate that will constitute just … gfa holdingWebCourt Documents Opinion of the Court United States Supreme Court 262 U.S. 679 Bluefield Waterworks Improvement Company v. Public Service Commission of West … gfa heathertonWebUnited States Supreme Court BLUEFIELD WATER WORKS CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (1923) No. 256 Argued: January 22, 1923 Decided: June 11, 1923 [262 … christopher wargo md vermontWebIn the Bluefleld Water Works case, decided in 1923, the Supreme Court not only restated its earlier pronouncements concerning fair rate of return but also made several new observations. christopher warnimont